In truth? I don't think your competent enough to get that far.

but more deeply its both trust security, and legal liability.

First you need to gain access to the system in the first place. Then you need to have unfettered access and be undetected. Considering this has been the number one ledger attack since the beginning of time (which is why tally sticks were a thing, and double entry book keeping) There are lots of systems in place to stop, detect or alert. Not only that you have the statement generating system which sends out physical copies of the account monthly.

Second we would need clearing houses to not notice that there is a mismatch in funds.

third when you try to extract that cash, we'd need the money laundering alarms to not go off. Which, if you've tried to buy a house in the UK, you know is not at all trivial.

You have to realise that the banking system is reliant on a bunch of very bored, highly motivated, fresh out of uni graduates to tally, move and generally be the grease that moves capital about. They will have tried all sorts of tricks to cheat, scam & salami slice money. There is a huge amount of effort going on to stop, detect and deflect fraud. Mainly because the banks are liable for it.

So for standard bank accounts, the chance of someone getting access to a server and changing the values of my account and not being detected are pretty limited. Not impossible, but small.

And thats the key. If the bank cocks up, the law is very much on my side as a consumer. the bank will be compelled to reverse the fraud. If they don't they get fined and or loose their license (although in practice, I don't think thats likely.)

With zero trust, if someone cocks up a digital contract and someone extracts the entire escrow value, game over. no recourse, other than to try and take the perp to court.